Contact about Links References search Home


back to grid

Proximal Lesion – minimal cavitation

Description
Treatment for these lesions will be dependant upon its position in relation to the crest of the marginal ridge and ease of access.
Without dictating the cavity outline or form there are at least three variations possible as follows –
Tunnel Cavity
The lesion is >2.5 mm below the marginal ridge so it is possible to retain the basic strength of the proximal surface of the crown of the tooth.
Slot Cavity

The lesion is <2.5mm below the crest of the marginal ridge which is likely to fail if a tunnel is prepared.
Proximal approach

The lesion can be accessed directly through a larger Size 3 or 4 lesion in the adjacent tooth.

Click on images to view full size.
Tunnel cavity design
The problem with this design is the potential for lowering the strength of the marginal ridge. If the lesion is more than 2.5mm from the crest of the ridge and the access cavity through the occlusal surface is kept to a minimum this can be a very conservative and aesthetic restoration.”
Click on the image to see a larger version Lab-
In this laboratory series there is a small proximal lesion identified radiographically on the distal of the first molar. The decision to regard the lesion as Size1 rather than Size 0 will be taken following separation to identify the presence or absence of cavitation.”
Click on the image to see a larger version Lab-
The teeth were separated using a small orthodontic rubber separator ring and a small discrete impression taken of the interproximal space using a rubber base impression material.
Click on the image to see a larger version Lab-
Careful examination of the surface of the impression shows there is actual cavitation in the enamel and therefore some limited degree of surgical intervention is justified.
Click on the image to see a larger version Lab-
To prove the point the model is dismantled to show the proximal surface with the limited cavitation. Note that the lesion is more than 2.5mm. below the crest of the marginal ridge.
Lab-
A tunnel cavity has been prepared and restored with a high strength auto-cure glass-ionomer.
Lab-
The model has been dismantled again to show the ultimate restoration. Note the demineralised enamel surrounding the glass-ionomer. This is still smooth and hard, though stained and disfigured, so it may remain and will remineralise. Note that the strength of the marginal ridge has not been compromised with this design.
Lab-
The tooth has now been sectioned to demonstrate the cavity design. Note that the cavity floor is no closer to the pulp than it would be if a standard Class II GV Black cavity had been cut.
Clinical
Bitewing radiographs taken in a clinical case showing a lesion at the distal of the upper first molar. It was apparent that a tunnel cavity was indicated.
Clinical
A standard tunnel cavity has been prepared and is ready to be restored with glass-ionomer.
Clinical
The completed restoration using an early version of a Type II.1 restorative aesthetic glass-ionomer. As there was a risk of early water contamination it had to be sealed with an unfilled resin immediately after the cement had set.
Clinical
Placement was apparently successful because this is the same restoration 12 years after placement.
Slot Cavity design
This is the first of a laboratory series showing the design of a slot cavity. Note the presence of the lesion on the distal of the first bicuspid.
The lesion is very close to the marginal ridge and it is apparent that it would collapse if a tunnel design was utilised.
The reassembled model showing the design of the cavity. It is limited to the extent of the demineralisation only so there is still a tooth to tooth contact towards the buccal. This will make it easier to maintain a sound contact between the teeth.
The tooth has been removed from the model to show the design of the final cavity. Note that there is demineralised enamel surrounding the cavity that is expected to remineralise in the absence of disease. Depending upon the occlusion it is possible to restore this cavity with glass-ionomer only or else it can be based with GIC and laminated with composite resin.
Proximal Approach
The proximal approach lesion can only be restored if there is a large cavity already present in the adjacent tooth. In this case the presence of the Site 2, Size 1 lesion was identified on the radiograph. It was clearly revealed following removal of a large Site 2, Size 3 amalgam that was due for replacement dentistry.
Access is gained through the Size 3 cavity. Visibility is often limited but preservation of the marginal ridge is desirable.
The completed cavity design. Note that there is still demineralised enamel around the periphery and probably some softened dentine on the axial wall. However, once sealed with a bioactive glass- ionomer  these areas will remineralise.
The completed restoration using a high strength auto cure glass-ionomer that is radiopaque. Note the surrounding demineralised enamel that is quite smooth and is expected to remineralise in the absence of disease.

Top^

 

Copyright © 2003 Graham J Mount